If I have the possibility to change the programme of the career is the pragmatic process that happens when you don’t pass a subject and you practically lose a year of the career. In my opinion, you only have to take the failed subject, but that’s not happen. I think that is so depressive for us. And I would change the mode of communication between the students and some academic, I think nowadays the difference of "power" is disgusting, we need more empathy. In these two years I learned to face different types of teaching, some easier to carry than others but I always have the same conclusion, I need more teachers and less academic. The first year of the career was an introduction, we take the bases to expand the knowledge for the following years. As it is an engineering career, I would say that all subjects have mathematics. Some more than others. In my opinion the workload is specific term that when is closer to the finals is awful, but it is a constant communication between teachers and students. The length of studies is longer than I would have thought, but I think is a problem of the study in Chile. For me, we have subjects that are not necessary. About infrastructure, I have nothing to say. It is the most beautiful faculty that I’ve been and the technology is arguable, because I know the big facilities difference between others faculty. Equalities between faculties are missing and we notice it. xo